Dress for Women Evening Cocktail Party On Sale Navy Blue Cotton 2017 10 12 14 8 Sun 68 Sale Clearance Store Cheap Sale New Arrival Top Quality itjBzD

SKU628838720077631198675
Dress for Women, Evening Cocktail Party On Sale, Navy Blue, Cotton, 2017, 10 12 14 8 Sun 68
Dress for Women, Evening Cocktail Party On Sale, Navy Blue, Cotton, 2017, 10 12 14 8 Sun 68
SUBSCRIBE
+1-646-6882318
nicki@theglasshammer.com

Article

Carl Zimmer: Hello, Biologic Institute. If I make a strong claim about science in an online forum, and someone asks me for evidence for that claim, I do not say, “Well, you’ll just have to read my book.” I provide the evidence–I point to the peer-reviewed research on which I based my statement. But, hey, I’d be perfectly satisfied if you pointed me to a scientific paper that presents calculations showing that the chromosome fusion could not have happened six million years ago. I can go find it for myself–if such a paper actually exists.

Well, that was the last I heard from the Biologic Institute. They still haven’t piped back up on their own thread. However, I did hear from someone who had read the book, Paul MacBride. ( Cheap Manchester Great Sale Cheap Sale Release Dates Sleeveless Top NAZAR by VIDA VIDA Sale Cheap Online Really Cheap Shoes Online TsK6mZaQG5
.) Here’s the comment he left on Facebook:

Carl, I can tell you the answer to your question, as I have read the book. Luskin provides no evidence for this. Well, more correctly, he quotes a question from this paper http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12421751 “If the fusion occurred within the telomeric repeat arrays less than ∼6 Mya, why are the arrays at the fusion site so degenerate?” but not their three suggested answers. Luskin asserts that if a chromosomal fusion occurred it should have been a neat and tidy joining of the two chromosomes in question, anything else is a Problem For Evolution. Dave Wisker addressed this succintly in a comment at Panda’s Thumb http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2012/07/paul-mcbrides-r.html#comment-288503

That paper MacBride mentions? It’s the 2002 paper I mentioned at the start, the one that presented evidence for fusion based on a study of the human genome . In other words, the authors of this new intelligent design book cherry-pick a quote out of a paper that’s ten years old (you can check for yourself, the paper’s free). That, it seems, is all the evidence they have. If anyone tells you how impressive the science is behind intelligent design, how superior it is to evolutionary biology, may I suggest you use this example to show them how wrong they are.

I read the 2002 paper long ago, but MacBride’s link led me to reread it. I also noticed that it was cited by a number of more recent papers, including Eichler’s new one. It just goes to show how you can end up learning something new in the most unexpected places.

Update : Man, these folks will do anything to avoid just pointing me to some evidence.

Update

Update #2: Actually, they’ll do a lot more– Peter Pilotto Woman Coldshoulder Eyelet Cottonpoplin Mini Dress Blue Size 6 Peter Pilotto Discount Comfortable Buy Cheap Outlet Store 3XnVMHAC

Update #3: After five days, I finally got my answer. And it shows why the creationists are wrong. And thus ends this strange story.

[Image of centaur: Wikipedia]

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Evolution , The Tangled Bank , Top posts
ADVERTISEMENT

Links to this Post

July 19, 2012 at 12:28 pm

As a long time follower of the Disco Tute and their jolly good fellows I am well-acquainted with their standard replies when called out on their invented assertions. Some of them are as follows:

Boomerang: Email Productivity
Navigation Menu Menu

Posted By Alex Moore on Feb 12, 2016 | 36 comments

UPDATE: This post inspired Respondable, a new Boomerang feature! Respondable uses AI to evaluate the effectiveness of your emails (and help you increase the chance of a response) in real-time as you write. Try it today – the basic version is free!

Add Respondable for Gmail Get Respondable for Outlook

Over the past year, our customers asked Boomerang to remind them if they didn’t get a response to over 40 million emails. Writing emails that get responses is an incredibly valuable skill – and what makes an email likely to get a response is hard to determine.

There’s a lot of advice about how to write a good email on the web, from general writing advice to full sets of pre-written email templates. But almost none of that advice shows the data behind it (usually because there isn’t any), and a lot of it is contradictory.

So when we set out to send out a year-in-review email (yes, this was supposed to go out early in January, but we hit the lunar new year instead – happy Year of the Monkey!) to Boomerang users, we decided to make that email different from a typical startup year-in-review email. Instead of focusing how much we’ve grown * or showing off our swanky new logo ** , we decided to figure out what factors really matter when you want to get a response to your messages and send that instead.

The results were so interesting that we decided to share them here as well.

If you find this information helps you send better emails, we’d appreciate it if you give Boomerang a try in return. You can send emails at optimal times and get notified if your message doesn’t receive a response, so you remember to follow up. You can also include a read receipt, so you know if your message got lost in the pile. Boomerang comes with a Basic plan that lets you use it several times a month completely free.

Add Boomerang for Gmail Get Boomerang for Outlook

Thanks in advance for giving it a try! Now, without further ado, here’s the roundup of what really matters when you’re sending an email!

Our most surprising finding was that the reading grade level of your emails has a dramatic impact on response rates. Emails written at a 3rd grade reading level were optimal. They provided a whopping 36% lift over emails written at a college reading level and a 17% higher response rate than emails written even at a high school reading level. As someone who’s been described as a “pedantic rambler,” this one hits me right in the fingers. But rather than decry the state of English language education, I’ll just try to roll with it and streamline my lexicon simplify my verbiage use shorter words in shorter sentences.

FOLLOW US
FIND US
GET IN TOUCH

Webber StreetLondon, SE1 8QW Discount View Discount For Nice Halston Heritage Woman Pleated Printed Twill Halterneck Dress Black Size 4 Halston Heritage Buy Cheap Cheapest Extremely AXQq3

Tel: 020 7401 3382/3

Email: info@clpe.co.uk

LINKS

The Centre for Literacy in Primary Education is a registered charity no. 1092698 and a company limited by guarantee no. 04385537

© CLPE 2018. All Rights Reserved.